厨理厂

 找回密码
 立即注册

快捷登录

搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 298|回复: 0

取消是目前消费者无论是否违约都会集体

[复制链接]

1

主题

1

帖子

5

积分

青铜大厨

Rank: 1

积分
5
发表于 2024-3-13 16:19:58 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
One means of approaching the judiciary is to abruptly terminate the contractual obligations with the developer and thereby relativize the contractual relationship in a worrying way. Not only that, the massive cancellation of purchase and sale commitments for the same project puts the implementation of the project at risk. This harms the interests of consumers who actually expect work to be done when their respective projects are delivered. unit. Faced with this situation, the real estate industry and the federal government began discussing a regulatory proposal that would provide buyers and developers with clarity and predictability about when and how much refunds should be made to exiting buyers. The main purpose is to provide legal protection to the parties, especially the main parties, namely compliant consumers who expect delivery of goods. Your Home ensures that the flow of funds contained in the assigned assets is maintained to obtain construction financing and the financial health of the project.

Yet even in this context of debate over the content of normative texts there has been considerable criticism and very Manichaean reservations about the Israeli data that establish false premises worthy of better understanding and debate by society. Most projects fall under the so-called distributive estate, which constitutes a special system of rights and obligations that constitute a specific project. It forms the estate. Its main goal is to guarantee the flow of funds required for the completion of the project and the delivery of finished and finished products to consumers. This funding flow is primarily driven by resources generated from unit sales and bank financing. Yet large-scale dejudicialization requiring the cancellation of purchase and sale commitments for the unit and the immediate refund of virtually all amounts paid to date puts this asset protection at serious risk. This is because in the vast majority of cases the termination of the contract occurs before the work is completed and the amount paid by the canceling party is still linked to the allocated assets in order to ensure that the work is completed. Interruption of installment payments and sudden withdrawal of amounts paid, especially when multiple buyers withdraw, has a considerable impact on the development of the work] and puts at risk the delivery of units to consumers who remain in the project and are awaiting collection. to its unit] could even emphasize that the order to return the parcel before the completion of construction is illegal under the provisions of Article 6. Article 1 of Law No. Hasty cancellation of sales can also impact access to bank financing as financial institutions often release resources for construction only after verifying the minimum number of sales effectively sustained in the project. Cancellation thus benefits exiting consumers but seriously threatens responsible consumers. Another important factor to consider is that it is not possible to treat consumer groups as homogeneous. Current criticism is based on the argument that all consumers share the same degree of vulnerability and inadequacy.





回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|厨理厂 ( 苏ICP备20008042号-1 )

GMT+8, 2024-4-27 18:02 , Processed in 0.053056 second(s), 18 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表